Auditor Independence and Financial Reporting Quality: New Evidence from Listed Oil and Gas Companies in Nigeria

Authors

  • Loni Thadawus Department of Accounting, Adamawa State University, Mubi Author
  • Rukaiyatu Adamu Department of Accounting, Adamawa State University, Mubi Author
  • Pwagusadi Joyce Solomon Department of Accounting, Adamawa State University, Mubi Author
  • JOHN Iliya Department of Taxation, Adamawa State University, Mubi Author

Keywords:

Auditor independence, financial reporting quality, audit tenure, auditor switching, audit fees, Big-4 affiliation

Abstract

This study examined the effect of auditor independence on the financial reporting quality of listed oil and gas companies in Nigeria. The study addressed the limited sector-specific evidence and inconsistent findings regarding the effects of auditor switching, audit tenure, audit fees, and Big-4 affiliation on financial reporting quality. Anchored in Agency Theory, the study adopted an ex-post facto research design and obtained secondary data from the annual reports of six listed oil and gas companies covering 2012–2021, resulting in 60 firm-year observations. Financial reporting quality was measured using discretionary accruals estimated with the Modified Jones Model, while data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and Generalized Least Squares random-effects regression. The results showed that auditor switching and audit fees had positive but statistically insignificant effects on financial reporting quality, while Big-4 affiliation had a negative but insignificant effect. Audit tenure had a positive and statistically significant effect at the 10% level. The random-effects panel model reported an overall panel R² of 80.55%, indicating that the explanatory variables jointly accounted for a substantial proportion of the variation in financial reporting quality across the sampled firms and study period. The findings theoretically support the knowledge-effect perspective within Agency Theory by demonstrating that longer auditor–client relationships can strengthen monitoring through accumulated client- and industry-specific knowledge. Practically, the results suggest that auditor competence, engagement experience, and sector-specific expertise may be more important for financial reporting quality than frequent auditor rotation, audit fees, or audit-firm brand. The study recommends that regulators and corporate management adopt a balanced rotation policy that preserves beneficial auditor knowledge while strengthening partner rotation and safeguards against familiarity threats. The study contributes to the literature by providing sector-specific panel evidence that distinguishes the effects of four dimensions of auditor independence on financial reporting quality in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry. 

Downloads

Published

2026-08-11